By Evergreen and John Kostyack
Since the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued their climate disclosure proposal in March 2022, fossil fuel industry executives and their allies have launched an all-out campaign to stop this common-sense measure in its tracks.
The SEC’s proposal would require public companies to disclose their greenhouse gas pollution and other data regarding the climate-related financial risks they face. Opponents of the rule – like the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the same attorneys general who helmed the West Virginia v. EPA Supreme Court case – have spun a sky-is-falling narrative that exaggerates the rule’s cost and implementation challenges and denies the reality of climate risk. But each of these narrative ploys are really designed to conceal the weaknesses of their fossil fuel-centered business model.
In particular, many in the pro-fossil fuel expansion camp have attacked the need to address “transition risk,” a concept that refers to the economic impact that large-scale changes in clean energy policies, technologies and customer preferences have on a company’s long-term profitability. They argue that these dramatic changes are not currently a serious enough risk to companies’ bottomline and thus have no need to be disclosed to investors.