If people adopt these technologies, it will save them an average of about $1,800 a year on energy bills. So it's directly combating the high cost of these fossil fuels that are passed on to the consumer. And the benefits for my constituents and, really, for the whole country, go beyond the direct investments. There are researchers from Oxford that have just released some studies that have found that the more renewable technology that we build—technologies like solar panels and wind turbines and electric vehicles—the cheaper they get to produce. This is not the case in the fossil fuel industry, where prices have basically remained the same for about 140 years, if you adjust for inflation.
But the Inflation Reduction Act puts this massive investment into renewable energy that will dramatically lower renewable energy costs by more than just the monetary value of the tax credits. And that will accelerate the declining cost of renewable energy for decades to come, which will save Americans money well beyond the expiration of the tax credits. And it'll create a tipping point where clean energy ultimately will decline and cost well-below what we currently pay for fossil fuels.
Now, it also includes $4 billion for environmental justice initiatives in historically disadvantaged communities that have faced the worst effects of climate change. That's a huge priority for me and my constituents because we have a lot of areas in and around the district that have experienced the harms of air pollution, heat waves, wildfires, and Superfund sites. So if you really look at the totality and if you look at all the different places,where we're investing in environmental justice, that the amount is closer to about $60 billion for environmental justice initiatives. And so all of these different components when you put them together will be the biggest investment in taking on the climate crisis, protecting our people, protecting our planet, and doing it with justice for the most disadvantaged at the center.
This Bill Isn’t Perfect. What Are the Compromises?
Dr. Leah Stokes: We don't want to dismiss the fact that this bill is a compromise, right? It's not the bill that you would have written. It's not the bill that I would have written. It's not the bill that Representative Jayapal wrote, which passed the House. It had to be one that got the approval of Senator Joe Manchin. We always knew that, and we know what his interests are. They're not the same as mine and yours, or really the climate movement’s.
So, there have been some really not great provisions added to this bill, particularly leasing requirements that are going to particularly impact frontline communities. And you know, we have to hold that reality and talk about that. So holding these two complex feelings or two complex realities at the same time: We've also seen a bigger environmental justice investment in this bill than we've ever seen before, with the $60 billion. So, how are you grappling with that, with those two things at the same time, how does that make you feel sort of, or about the bill overall? What do you think about it?