We’re leading an all-out national mobilization to defeat the climate crisis.

Join our work today to help us build a thriving and just clean energy future. 

Donate

We’re leading an all-out national mobilization to defeat the climate crisis.

Join our work today to help us build a thriving and just clean energy future. 

Democrats Have a Winning Message on Energy Prices: Low-Cost Clean Energy

Energy costs are on the ballot this November, and only one candidate has a plan that can tackle it head-on

Composite of Harris, Trump, and an electricity meter.
© 2024 Andrew Hartnett/Evergreen Action

The climate crisis isn't just an environmental issue; it's an economic issue, hitting families the hardest. So, it’s unsurprising that rising energy costs and climbing monthly electricity bills are top-of-mind for voters just weeks away from a pivotal election. Misinformation is rampant, but there’s only one presidential candidate with a plan that actually lowers energy costs for Americans nationwide.

Vice President Kamala Harris just released her economic plan for all Americans, which tackles rising energy costs by investing in the cheapest forms of electricity in human history—renewables. This plan is built on a record of success. Harris cast the deciding vote on the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the biggest climate and clean energy bill in American history, one that has already boosted American manufacturing, jobs, and energy independence.

The IRA is projected to save American households hundreds of dollars every year. If we keep allowing the IRA to do what it was designed to do, while coupling it with additional smart clean energy and housing policies, we’ll see the energy savings families want and need. By contrast, Trump’s Project 2025 agenda, which calls for ending clean energy subsidies and relying on fossil fuel extraction, is projected to increase energy costs by $32 billion per year. His plan would wreak havoc on households, especially those in energy-burdened and low-income communities, along with crucial swing states like Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

What’s not driving up prices? Affordable, reliable clean energy. Renewable energy sources like wind and solar are cheaper than fossil fuels, full stop. Regardless of what Republican politicians and fossil fuel lobbyists might mislead you to think, clean energy is the key to a future with lower energy costs, grid reliability, and energy independence. And a Harris-Walz administration will get us there. Democrats have a winning message on energy prices: low-cost clean energy.

 

Clean Energy Is the Solution to Bringing Lower Costs

We’ve passed a “tipping point” in the last decade where renewables have become the cheapest source of electricity around. And it’s not even close. It simply makes no sense to turn back to yesterday’s technology when we have cleaner, cheaper, reliable options ready to deploy. 

Building new wind and solar projects is cheaper than running 99 percent of existing coal plants. It’s also cheaper than 99 percent of proposed gas plants around the country. It helps when your fuel—in this case, wind or sunshine—is effectively free. This affordability, whether by swapping out coal or gas with clean energy, then gets passed on to customers, with every megawatt-hour of onshore wind used instead of a gas plant saving customers $26 (PDF)

The IRA and other climate policies have started a self-propelling positive feedback loop, and tax credits and clean energy subsidies are expected to cut energy bills for every household by $170 to $220 each year. The proof is in the states that have already seen clean energy for the winner it is: States that have deployed the most wind and solar have seen energy prices lower than economy-wide inflation.

 

What Causes Energy Bills to Go Up?

The true blame for higher electricity costs falls squarely on volatile gas prices, costly, aging grid infrastructure, climate-fueled disasters threatening power infrastructure, bad investments in outdated fossil fuel power plants, and a self-interested utility business model. There is no doubt that profit- and shareholder-driven utilities have been jacking up the rates they charge customers; they even go so far as to bill customers for their own nefarious fossil fuel lobbying efforts

Line chart: Consistent volatility in natural gas prices from 2010 to 2024

Fossil fuel prices are inherently volatile, propelled by the uncontrollable forces of international conflicts and global market fluctuations. © 2024 Energy Innovation CC BY 4.0

Even with federal and state energy efficiency policies doing some serious heavy lifting by reducing household energy consumption and keeping bills lower than inflation, the core of the problem still comes down to utility greed and ongoing misguided investment in fossil fuels. 

In fact, the states that are most reliant on fossil gas for electricity generation have had the highest spikes in energy bills, with utilities passing on upswings in prices directly to customers. The same holds true for the country’s biggest public utility, the Tennessee Valley Authority, where new gas plants are already leading to almost 10 percent higher rates for customers

Fossil fuel prices are inherently volatile, propelled by the uncontrollable forces of international conflicts and global market fluctuations. Relying on fossil fuels hands over our agency to foreign actors, like Putin and OPEC. You’d never take a bet on anything with such unpredictable odds as fossil fuels, so why would we bind our entire nation’s energy future to it?

Plans to build more gas plants, like those proposed by Trump-Vance, would only increase costs and risks for consumers. By contrast, clean energy, incentivized and turbo-charged through the IRA, provides stable, long-term cost savings.

So, Where Do Harris and Trump Stand on Energy?

While Donald Trump and Vice President Harris might share space on the ballot this November, they couldn’t be further apart in terms of their policies and vision for our energy future. 

On the one hand, we have Donald Trump, a man whose “energy plan” is guided by oil-soaked campaign contributions and fossil fuel lobbyists. He has vowed to repeal the IRA, and all the benefits that come with it, nix all current and future clean energy investments, and instead rely entirely on last century’s polluting fossil fuel technologies.

By doing so, Donald Trump would not only raise energy prices for families, he would put tens of thousands of clean energy workers out of their jobs. Jobs that were born out of the IRA and other Biden-Harris initiatives. Jobs that are working to bring more low-cost clean energy online and into communities.

Trump is not an “all of the above” candidate. He wants to kneecap clean energy for his fossil fuel donors, even if it costs the rest of us billions and destroys the climate.

In fact, non-partisan modeling has shown the energy policies in Donald Trump’s Project 2025 would raise energy costs by at least $32 billion a year by 2030.

Vice President Harris’ plan offers a better future. She has pledged to keep driving our clean energy transition forward and build on the investments within the IRA, which will lower costs for homeowners and all utility customers.

Where would each candidate get us? Harris would add millions of jobs, billions in GDP, lower energy costs by billions, and reduce climate pollution. Trump's Project 2025 would do the opposite.

Data Source: 2024 Energy Innovation. Graphic: © 2024 Andrew Hartnett/Evergreen Action

Her newly-announced policy plan prioritizes affordable energy-efficient housing and proposes to dramatically expand tax credits for 1.2 million more affordable rental homes, clear the way to retrofit 400,000 buildings, and launch a $40 billion federal effort to build affordable and energy-efficient homes near good transit options.

Electrifying homes not only makes them safer and more efficient; it also leads to lower, more affordable energy bills. By protecting and building on the historic clean energy investments in the IRA, Harris will enable thousands of new low-cost clean energy projects to come online and reduce electric bills.

 

What’s Next?

The IRA is only the beginning, and for the customers still facing high utility bills right now, there’s of course more to be done. The only way we can achieve nationwide lower bills is to continue on the forward-thinking path the Biden-Harris administration started.

Continuing to invest in clean energy has and will continue to pay dividends—from growing American-owned manufacturing capacity to lowering costs in the long term to building greater energy independence. This is what a winning bet for America actually looks like, and it is only possible under a Harris-Walz presidency. 

 


 

Headshot of Charles Harper

Editor - Charles Harper

Charles is the power sector senior policy lead for Evergreen. He leads Evergreen’s campaign to fully decarbonize the electric sector by building a thriving clean energy economy.